<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: OnForce Unveils v 5.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/</link>
	<description>... from &#38; about the world's largest marketplace for IT service professionals</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 18:09:57 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/comment-page-1/#comment-29614</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 04:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/?p=252#comment-29614</guid>
		<description>As a new pro I am very happy with the design of the site. One suggestion I would like to add is a section on PPNS that detail what each PPN is looking for in a provider. There is not much information about what PPNS are even available. Would be nice to know if I was to for example get a background check would that open up opportunities for joining a PPN?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a new pro I am very happy with the design of the site. One suggestion I would like to add is a section on PPNS that detail what each PPN is looking for in a provider. There is not much information about what PPNS are even available. Would be nice to know if I was to for example get a background check would that open up opportunities for joining a PPN?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Legendre</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/comment-page-1/#comment-29612</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Legendre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 13:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/?p=252#comment-29612</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to still see a way that my back office staff could have their own log ins and not have to use mine when trying to close out jobs and process funds transfers. Can you create a user that would just be a back office worker and not a technician?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to still see a way that my back office staff could have their own log ins and not have to use mine when trying to close out jobs and process funds transfers. Can you create a user that would just be a back office worker and not a technician?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/comment-page-1/#comment-29611</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 06:47:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/?p=252#comment-29611</guid>
		<description>Still need to display the buyers name when we first see the work order, there are some buyers who are bad for business and others I would bend over backwards to get them taken care of.  Just list who the buyer is right along with the location.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still need to display the buyers name when we first see the work order, there are some buyers who are bad for business and others I would bend over backwards to get them taken care of.  Just list who the buyer is right along with the location.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Bedell</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/comment-page-1/#comment-29610</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Bedell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:20:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/?p=252#comment-29610</guid>
		<description>Bringing back quick routing would be great.  It seems jobs are drying up.  Hope to see it on the next update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bringing back quick routing would be great.  It seems jobs are drying up.  Hope to see it on the next update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/comment-page-1/#comment-29608</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Oct 2008 00:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/?p=252#comment-29608</guid>
		<description>I have been thinking that, as for as the make an offer section is concerned, giving the service pro the address location in the initial work order notice(just the address, not the phone number or the end user&#039;s name), would help them decide what they want to charge as it will help them determine how far they might have to travel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been thinking that, as for as the make an offer section is concerned, giving the service pro the address location in the initial work order notice(just the address, not the phone number or the end user&#8217;s name), would help them decide what they want to charge as it will help them determine how far they might have to travel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amdreas</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2008/09/21/onforce-unveils-v-50/comment-page-1/#comment-29606</link>
		<dc:creator>Amdreas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Sep 2008 07:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/?p=252#comment-29606</guid>
		<description>Derek, I agree that the calendar support should be for iCal. That would be the most universal solution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derek, I agree that the calendar support should be for iCal. That would be the most universal solution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
