Comments on: Important Update Coming to Buyer and Provider Work Order Activity Reports

By: BenCh

BenCh — Fri, 08 Feb 2008 17:22:01 +0000

Advertising would be great, but goes both ways. Advertising would mean more buyers as well as more providers. Good for Onforce, may not be so good for us providers. That would depend on the ratio of new buyers to new providers.

By: TAYLOR T.

TAYLOR T. — Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:46:04 +0000

I AGREE WO SHOULD BE MORE DETAILED LIKE THIS KEEPS TECHS IN ORDER BETTER RESPONSE TIMES AND ECH CONTROLABILTY

By: Compucrash

Compucrash — Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:43:17 +0000

I think that onforce should advertise. Not only would it help provide more work orders for us it would make onforce much more money. Why would a buyer not want to use a central place to reach more providers at once rather than spend the time looking through the phone book, calling the first one they come acrossed and possibly end up over paying for less work. I know that a lot of PC repair companies in my area charge an arm and a leg for their services and do work worthy of 1/3 of what they have been paid to do it. The work i have gotten so far though has been great.

By: Bruce Lignell

Bruce Lignell — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:47:38 +0000

Myself Like Keith J. Am struggleing for w/o’s In Northern Indiana It seems that some techs do have that extra edge over some us. Then some buyers Dont Really understand that Indiana Is a Rural State and what is a flat rate doesnt pay but for us to travel to the site. There are a few buyers that use onforce in this area that do understand the Cost of living and that alot of the small towns are outside the 60 mile range. The Major buyers in this area have ceased to use onforce as much as they have gone to their own technical staffing. I too would like to see some advertising To promote our services. All the updates to the site Dont bring in work for us, If we have no work than we have no use for the updates.

By: Jeremy P.

Jeremy P. — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 02:03:34 +0000

Thanks for the reporting stuff. Now can you work on adding Conditional Offers to the WAP site? It really limits me when I am out on the road making a 10% commission for OnForce. That 10% commission increases when my spend limit is increased. Seems like enough incentive too me. Otherwise, it goes to the lowest bidder and OnForce makes less money, as do I. Hope someone sees this.

Thanks.

By: Dick

Dick — Mon, 12 Nov 2007 16:08:44 +0000

Las Vegas, NV
I think that Onforce needs to let us know what WO’s are directed to specific providers in our areas. I have been a provider that has experienced directed WO’s.

Sitting in front of our computers, or other devices, and being prepared to “pounce” on a WO as soon as it is broadcast is not what I want to do, but until I have sufficient WO’s directed to me I will do it.

The “rateing” system from buyers and providers needs to be looked at. When a buyer or provider blockes someone, a notice should be given.