<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Release: OnForce v3.3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/</link>
	<description>... from &#38; about the world's largest marketplace for IT service professionals</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 06:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Asif Hasan</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Asif Hasan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 18:36:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-744</guid>
		<description>I am  full-time  on Onforce and I am loving it.  I get a lot of jobs. Thanks a billion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am  full-time  on Onforce and I am loving it.  I get a lot of jobs. Thanks a billion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyle</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-743</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Nov 2006 14:19:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-743</guid>
		<description>I like the improvements - keep it up!

Given the speed at which the marketplace changes, please adjust the conditional offer time limit accordingly - being able to change the time limit to 30 min, 1 hour or 90 minutes - also notification via SMS of rejection of a conditional offer would give buyers &#38; providersfaster feedback.

also if a provider has 30 workorders in good standing (say 5.5 or better) , please increase the range on the Local Service Area from 60 to 120 miles - it would give providers an incentive to do  better by being able to possible increase their work orders and lets buyers know how far some providers will go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the improvements - keep it up!</p>
<p>Given the speed at which the marketplace changes, please adjust the conditional offer time limit accordingly - being able to change the time limit to 30 min, 1 hour or 90 minutes - also notification via SMS of rejection of a conditional offer would give buyers &amp; providersfaster feedback.</p>
<p>also if a provider has 30 workorders in good standing (say 5.5 or better) , please increase the range on the Local Service Area from 60 to 120 miles - it would give providers an incentive to do  better by being able to possible increase their work orders and lets buyers know how far some providers will go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-741</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Nov 2006 20:55:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-741</guid>
		<description>Do you have in place, or are you considering, a method to keep the provider list current?  Maybe something that would poll providers with no activity in the last 90 days, and then mark as in-active the profiles of those that do not respond?

This would route WO's to the more active providers, and create a better provider list for the buyers to select from.

I know this may not affect everyone, but it is something that I believe should be looked at.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you have in place, or are you considering, a method to keep the provider list current?  Maybe something that would poll providers with no activity in the last 90 days, and then mark as in-active the profiles of those that do not respond?</p>
<p>This would route WO&#8217;s to the more active providers, and create a better provider list for the buyers to select from.</p>
<p>I know this may not affect everyone, but it is something that I believe should be looked at.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-705</link>
		<dc:creator>dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 16:12:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-705</guid>
		<description>Michael,

Please see our blog post about "Release v3.1":http://blog.onforce.com/2006/09/19/onforce-v31, which has information about our "Minimum Spend Limit Feature" that should address your request. This was released on September 19th.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,</p>
<p>Please see our blog post about &#8220;Release v3.1&#8243;:http://blog.onforce.com/2006/09/19/onforce-v31, which has information about our &#8220;Minimum Spend Limit Feature&#8221; that should address your request. This was released on September 19th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-704</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 15:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-704</guid>
		<description>I was advised that with the v3.3 update we would be able to filter work orders by price with the ability to exclude the work orders that don't meet our desired price range.  I don't see that functionality currently in place.  Can we expect that in the near future?

Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was advised that with the v3.3 update we would be able to filter work orders by price with the ability to exclude the work orders that don&#8217;t meet our desired price range.  I don&#8217;t see that functionality currently in place.  Can we expect that in the near future?</p>
<p>Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dana</title>
		<link>http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-703</link>
		<dc:creator>dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Nov 2006 14:11:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.onforce.com/2006/11/14/new-release-onforce-v33/#comment-703</guid>
		<description>Mr. Johnson,

Please "contact our support team":http://www.onforce.com/contact, who can help diagnose your issue. Unfortunately, we cannot provide support via our blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Johnson,</p>
<p>Please &#8220;contact our support team&#8221;:http://www.onforce.com/contact, who can help diagnose your issue. Unfortunately, we cannot provide support via our blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
